//
you're reading...

Featured

Happy Australia Day! (Unless of course you’re an Indigenous Australian)

This article originally appeared on The ABC’s The Drum website.

It was lunchtime, 1988. Grade two. Friday, right before sport. I’d just accidentally hit Alan Northen* in the back of the head with a seven iron whilst practicing my swing.

I wasn’t very good at sport, in fact I have it on good word I was the only student in the history of Sanctuary Point Primary School to fail kindergarten PE. Golf was the only activity they’d let me participate in because I wasn’t co-ordinated enough to hit, kick or catch a ball that moved faster than the earth’s natural rotation. I was even banned from T-Ball after I let go of the bat mid-swing and sent it flying in a furious arc towards Miss Ramsay’s nose. I’m surprised they didn’t just lock me in the library on Friday afternoons where the most damage I could do was give myself papercuts. That being said, it wasn’t entirely my fault Alan got hit in the head either. Alan always had scabs, so clearly he wasn’t very good at choosing places to stand.

Fortunately Alan hadn’t seen it was me, so I told him Luke Clarke was the culprit. As far as blame-shifting went, it wasn’t quite up there with Mary’s immaculate conception concept, but it was good. It was good because at that point Luke was running past us and towards Heather Moore with a two wood in his possession. I had a crush on Heather Moore. Not only was Luke leaving the scene of a crime with a weapon in his hand, he was cutting my grass. Alan and I agreed vengeance was in order. Matthew Macloud offered to assist.

Matthew Macloud was Aboriginal and reckoned he could put together a gang of sorts. We used to hear stories about Aboriginal gangs fighting on the oval behind the Sanctuary Point shops from time to time. Someone even got shot once, and we had no reason to doubt his posse-bility. Not wanting to be out-done, Alan told us his dad had two guns. That was even better than a gang. Way better. My dad had a stamp collection. I knew that wasn’t going to cut it. We went to church too, so I knew I could probably get Jesus on my side, but that meant telling people I went to church, and that would get me beaten-up. I went left-field and told them that my great, great, great, great grandfather was David Jones, the guy with the department store, and that I could get whatever I wanted from the store, including, like, 100 steak knives, and that was better than two guns or a gang.

This revelation was met with scepticism.

Matthew pointed out my last name was not, in fact, Jones. Alan described my assertion as ‘bull’. Matthew said that if David Jones was my great great great great grandfather we would be rich, and that we weren’t. He pointed out I was wearing shorts my mum had made, and that I’d cut the tag off the inside of the only Rip Curl shirt I owned and stuck it on the outside of the shorts, with superglue, upside down, and that if my great great great great grandfather was David Jones, I wouldn’t have had to do that. He pointed out that he had proper surf shorts on, therefore he was richer than me, therefore my great great great great grandfather could not possibly be David Jones.

It was irrefutable logic.

Like most nine-year-olds, I made a lot of stuff up about my family. At least two kids in my class had uncles who owned Ferraris. One had an older brother who lived in Sydney and ran a roller coaster shop. Eight were millionaires, two were gazillionaires, three had dads who played football for Australia before I was born so that’s why I didn’t know who they were, and at least two boys in my grade had fathers who were trained military assassins currently serving in the French Foreign Legion.

I should have just said my Dad had a bazooka and been done with it, but, on this occasion, I’d gone with the truth. David Jones was my great, great, great, great grandfather. I’d seen the family tree. He might have been an acorn in the 18th century and I was a piece of moss growing on an oak leaf which fell to the ground sometime during the Cold War, but my Mum’s, Mum’s, Mother’s Dad’s, Mother was in fact David Jones’s daughter. It was a tenuous link, but it was still a link. I wasn’t lying.

Not to be out-done, Alan Northern informed us that his great great great great grandfather was Captain Cook. Matthew Macloud had no idea who his great great great great grandfather was. He had no idea who his grandfather was either. Alan and I thought this was strange because Aboriginal kids at our school tended to have about four hundred cousins each. It stood to our reasoning that with all those cousins he should have had at least eight grandfathers. He mentioned something about his mum being adopted and steered the conversation towards the subject of the gaping wound now gushing blood from Alan’s head. It was 1988 and no one had really heard of the stolen generations yet.

In grade two I’d fainted in the Shoalhaven City Library two hours after a trip to the dentist to have a tooth removed because I could taste blood in my mouth. In grade one I’d passed out in bed because I woke up in the middle of the night with a bloody nose. I was never going to be a surgeon, but I managed to get Alan to sick bay and recommended the office ladies apply some Vaseline, like they did in Rocky. They opted for a butterfly band-aid instead. Everyone agreed that a butterfly band-aid was second only in coolness to actual stitches and Alan was greeted as a war hero on his return to the playground.

Alan recovered from his injuries that day I do believe. As far as I can gather from a Google search, he is now working at a uranium mine in the Northern Territory. Luke Clarke escaped retribution too and is, or at least was, the operations manager of a football club in Wollongong. Heather Moore, according to Facebook, is married, and still a hottie.

I have no idea what happened to Matthew Macloud, but since he’s Aboriginal, I know the following:

  • He is likely to live for 11.5 years less than me.
  • There is a 46% chance he is not employed.
  • There is a 78% chance he did not finish grade 12.
  • When I knew him as a youth, his chances of imprisonment were 28 times higher than mine.
  • He is 13 times more likely to be jailed than a non-Indigenous adult (unless you are a non-Aboriginal adult and your surname is Milat, in which case, your chances of being jailed are exceptional).
  • He is three times more likely to die from cardiovascular disease than I am.
  • He is nine times more likely to have end-stage renal disease (kidney failure) than me.
  • As a 31-year-old (I think that’s how old he’d be) he is three times more likely to have committed suicide than a non-aboriginal person.
  • He is six times more likely to have been arrested than me (I have been arrested**, so that statistic lacks a bit of punch, but still, on the whole, he is six times more likely to have been arrested).

All those stats are appalling, but I think the worst one, if you can choose a ‘worst’ tragic statistic, is this:

  • There is a 28% chance he lives in a household which has run out of money for basic living expenses in the past year.

I’m not making that up. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, in 2008, the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who lived in households which had run out of money for basic living expenses in the previous 12 months was 28%. And that was considered a massive improvement because eight years prior to that the figure was 44%.

Matthew Macloud was a lovely guy. We were friends in primary school and we went to Vincentia High School together for a few years. Vincentia High was only 11km from the Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community and 10% of its students identified as Aboriginal. I lost track of him in grade 10 when I moved from the NSW South Coast to a private school on the Queensland Gold Coast. That was pretty much the last time I had much to do with anyone Aboriginal. According to the government’s My School Website only 1% of the students at my Gold Coast high school identified as being Aboriginal (and even then, I’m guessing the website rounds up to the nearest 1% – the actual figure is probably closer to zero).

I don’t personally know any Aboriginal people anymore. I’ve got 350 Facebook friends and none of them are Indigenous Australians. The most contact I have with Aboriginal or Torres Straight Islanders these days is when I drive past the park in Brisbane’s West End and there’s a group of them drinking VB tallies from paper bags. You know what I usually think when I drive past? I think “Why is it that every time I see an Aboriginal person they’re drinking in a park?”

Then I realise that’s a politically incorrect thought, so I make myself think “The majority of Aboriginal people don’t spend their days drinking in a park, it’s just that the park-drinking ones are the only ones I bump into. Remember Matthew Macloud? He was nice.”

And then I feel better for a bit for not being so racist and judgemental. And then I think about all the horrible statistics I know about Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islanders and how terrible they have it, statistically speaking. And then I think about the time I went to Uluru and how amazing and spiritual it was. Oprah thought so too. Oprah never lies. But then I think about the families I saw living in the creek bed near Alice Springs in shanty towns that would make the Delhi Commonwealth games organisers blush. And I think, ‘maybe I’m not just being racist and judgemental and maybe there is actually something going on here and maybe something’s broken and no one knows how to fix it’.

And then they’re out of sight and I forget about it because, at the end of the day, it’s a free country and it’s their problem not mine, and to be honest, I quite like drinking in the park too.

But you know what?

This is my problem. It’s our problem.

Whether your great great great great grandfather arrived in Sydney Cove in 1834 to set up a department store, or whether you’ve just stepped off a boat in Flying Fish Cove, Christmas Island, if you want to be part of Australia’s future, you’re in charge. This is a democracy. This is happening on your watch.

If you live in Australia and you’re black, you’re statistically going to die a dozen years earlier than everyone else. And there’s a 28 per cent chance your household didn’t have enough money to buy things like bread and milk this year.

These are massively real problems. They also have solutions. There actually is something you can do about it. Here are four solutions. There are more, but these are a good start.

Solution #1 – Understand the issues: Since a bunch of white boat people turned up in Botany Bay 223 years ago on Australia Day, 1788 and said “hey guys, we’ll be living here now, have some tuberculosis,” non-Indigenous Australians have showed a near complete lack of understanding about the plight of Indigenous Australians.

For the first 150 or so years after Europeans first arrived, Aborigines were treated as a second-class race of people who would almost certainly ‘die out’ sooner or later (like the 54 animal species which have disappeared since 1788). When it didn’t happen through disease, neglect and the odd massacre here and there, legislation was introduced to force the assimilation of Aboriginal people into white Australian society by separating children from their families. The intention was, to quote the 1935 Annual Report of the NSW Board for the Protection of Aborigines: “graduating the Aboriginal from his former primitive state to the standards of the white man, among whom he is gradually learning to stand as a self-respecting citizen”. White people thought they were helping. The result was cultural genocide.

Granting Aboriginal people the right to be counted as citizens in 1967, a move which should have been a great leap forward, resulted in arguably the biggest step backward since 1788. As respected Aboriginal rights advocate, Noel Pearson explained in his August 2000 speech ‘The Light On The Hill’:

The irony of our newly won citizenship in 1967 was that after we became citizens with equal rights and the theoretical right to equal pay, we lost the meagre foothold that we had in the real economy and we became almost comprehensively dependent upon passive welfare for our livelihood. So in one sense we gained citizenship and in another sense we lost it at the same time. Because we find thirty years later that life in the safety net for three decades and two generations has produced a social disaster. And we should not be surprised … You put any group of people in a condition of overwhelming reliance upon passive welfare support – that is support without reciprocation – and within three decades you will get the same social results that my people in Cape York Peninsula currently endure. Our social problems do not emanate from an innate incapacity on the part of our people. Our social problems are not endemic, they have not always been with us. We are not a hopeless or imbecile people.

Pauline Hanson argued in her maiden speech to Parliament in 1996 that “we now have a situation where a type of reverse racism is applied to mainstream Australians by those who promote political correctness.” To her credit on that particular point, she wasn’t far from the truth. Since the 1960s Australia and America have both suffered varying degrees of ‘white guilt’ – a ‘victimhood’ notion that ‘white’ people (the term is in reference to all people who aren’t Indigenous Australians, not just people of European origin) are indebted to black people for past injustices.

The answer is therefore for white people to bear the burden of fixing the problem. When the outcome is land rights and greater respect for and recognition of Indigenous culture, or ‘peoplehood’, as some put it, it’s a good thing. When the outcome is passive welfare and other ‘handouts’ to appease a social conscience, it’s a terrible thing. As Noel Pearson puts it: “White guilt is a resource blacks in America and Australia have learned to mine.”

Until you understand the problem, and the difference between policies which work and policies which exist to appease white guilt, you’ll never be in a position to create a real solution. You’ll be in the pub arguing with your mates and you’ll either be trying to defend passive welfare, or you’ll be saying that Aborigines get too much special treatment and it should be stopped. Neither position is tenable or useful.

Read up on the issues. Go through Noel Pearson’s speeches and essays. Familiarise yourself with black history. Get informed.

Solution #2 – Don’t Be Racist: “But I’m not racist,” you’re probably thinking.

Guess what. You almost certainly are to some degree. In 2006 an Aboriginal elder in residence at Griffith University in Brisbane suffered a stroke at a campus bus stop and lay there for five hours in her own vomit before a group of Japanese students came to her aid. A thousand others had walked right on by without giving it a second thought. These people weren’t members of the Ku Klux Klan, they were university staff, students and State Government bus drivers.

You probably wouldn’t discriminate in a professional environment based on someone’s skin colour. Not only would that be illegal, it’s also morally wrong and as a society we’ve come a long way since some Australian swimming pools were segregated in the 1960s. But racism rears its ugly head in subtle ways.

Noel Pearson puts it this way: “Rather than denial or moral vanity, the optimum position for non‐Indigenous people to take is that of acknowledgement – of the past and its legacy in the present, recognising that racism is not a contrivance, that Indigenous people endure great hurt and confront barriers as a result of racism. They need to take responsibility for the fact of racism, and work to answer and counter it.”

Solution #3 – Support the Indigenous economy: If passive welfare was the single biggest step backward in Indigenous Australian history, economic independence is probably the single biggest step forward. Supporting the Indigenous economy goes way beyond ‘teaching a man to fish’. They know how to fish. Take a holiday to Uluru or Kakadu and put some money into the local communities. Buy ethically produced Aboriginal art. Well managed mining leases on traditional Aboriginal lands are a hugely important source of income and employment for the local people. Read up on which mining companies are supporting Aboriginal workers and land rights and invest in them. Mining magnate Andrew Forrest is a thought leader on this. Check out his plans.

Solution #4 – Donate to worthy causes: Plenty of charities and organisations spend time and money helping disadvantaged Indigenous communities. Look them up. Give them money. Support Aboriginal schools. Support organisations which help disadvantaged inner city Aboriginal kids get a leg up.

This Australia Day, spare a thought for those affected by the devastating floods. Flip them a coin if you can – they need it, my parents included. Polish off a few cans of our national beverage if you like too – hell, do it in a park. But if you do nothing else, get off your arse and do something about fixing the gaping, ugly disparity between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. It’s been 223 years already. If not now, when?

*Some names in this story have been changed in case my memory isn’t completely accurate and I’ve accused someone of being scabby when in actual fact they had skin as supple and smooth as a five-year-old European skincare product model.

** I was once arrested on suspicion of stealing money from a Dominos pizza store where I worked as a delivery boy. They let me go and apologised when they realised they were actually just rather bad at maths. I haven’t told my mum about that one yet. Sorry mum, it was traumatic at the time, but I’m fine now.

IMAGE CREDIT: David Jackmanson

0saves
Did you like this post? Why not Leave a comment, subscribe to the RSS feed, or get future articles from sent straight to your email address.
  • http://Website Mark

    > Solution #1 – Understand the issues…

    You kiddin me, right??? “Happy Australia Day” demonstrates a TOTAL LACK OF UNDERSTANDING of the issues.

    >Granting Aboriginal people citizenship in 1967….
    ALL Indigenous Australians were citizens BEFORE 1967. The 1967 referendum had NOTHING to do with citizenship for Indigenous Australians. Anyone can confirm that fact with a few minutes of competent research.

    >I have no idea what happened to Matthew Macloud, but since he’s Aboriginal, I know the following:
    * He is likely to live for 11.5 years less than me.
    * …..
    * ….. etc

    ALL of those statements based on ABS data, as stated in “Happy Australia Day” are factually WRONG. Every single one of them. If you don’t understand WHY they’re wrong, you’ll need to spend some time analysing the data on the ABS web site.

    And what happened to “Solution # 5 – Pressure the government to change the existing laws that deny rights to Indigenous Australians”?

    You can “Support the Indigenous Economy” and “Donate to Worthy Causes” till the cows come home – but until Governments actually give equal rights to Indigenous Australians, you’re just sticking band-aids on a weeping sore.

    For example, for the last 50 years large amounts of Australia have been returned to Indigenous Australians. About 20% of Australia (equivalent to the 20th largest country in the world) is Indigenously owned and controlled land. But Indigenous Australians are PROHIBITED from building their own house on any of it. Yep, the great Australian dream of owning your home is denied to Indigenous Australians living on their traditional lands. But you knew that, right?

    Oh, you didn’t know it? Just like you didn’t know that the 1967 referendum had NOTHING to do with giving citizenship to Indigenous Australians?

    Well, do you know the definition of a ‘Slacktivist’? Its an Activist who’s too LAZY to get the facts right and contribute to solving the problem. Here’s some advice for Slacktivists:

    “If you do nothing else this Australia Day, get off your arse and do something about learning the real issues that result in a gaping, ugly disparity between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. It’s been 223 years already. If you’re not going to get facts correct now, when?”

    Mark

  • http://www.ambiguityreport.blogspot.com Rick

    Don’t know how I missed this. Matt, bravo. Bravo. And Mark, I think you’re missing the point, Matt’s on your side. He’s trying to raise awareness. Sheesh, more than can be said for some. Or most, sadly.

  • http://www.mattgranfield.com/ Matt Granfield

    Mark, you’re absolutely right about the 1967 referendum. I was quoting Noel Pearson and didn’t think to check whether he was correct or not. That being said, the 1967 referendum gave Aboriginal Australians the right to be counted as citizens in the census, it also gave the government rights to be able to make laws specifically for Aboriginal people, the outcome of this was the passive welfare reforms Noel Pearson speaks about, so you’ve got me on a technicality and I’ve changed my wording slightly, but to be honest, I think you’ve missed the point.

    As for the ABS data, I can only quote what I see, I’m not making stats up. Some stats might be a little out of date now, but the issues are still the same.

  • http://Website Mark

    >I think you’ve missed the point.
    I’m sure you’ve missed the point. Its not enough that people CARE. To fix problems, you actually have to get stuff RIGHT.

    > the 1967 referendum gave Aboriginal Australians the right to be counted as citizens in the census
    Aboriginal Australians were counted in EVERY Australian census, including the ones before the 1967 referendum. Its not enough that people CARE. To fix problems, you actually have to get stuff RIGHT.

    > It also gave the government rights to be able to make laws specifically for Aboriginal people, the outcome of this was the passive welfare reforms
    No, the increase in welfare had nothing to do with giving the Federal Government the ability to make laws for people ‘of the Aboriginal race’. Its not enough that people CARE. To fix problems, you actually have to get stuff RIGHT.

    Nugget Coombs, the architect of Indigenous policy from the 1970s, CARED. He didn’t intend that his policies would create remote Indigenous communities of poverty and dysfunction – but they DID.

    > As for the ABS data, I can only quote what I see, I’m not making stats up.
    The ABS data in ‘Happy Australia Day’ is USED incorrectly. Australian Governments regularly make the same error. That is a major reason why they make little progress in improving Indigenous housing, education or health. Its not enough that people CARE. To fix problems, you actually have to get stuff RIGHT.

    As I noted in my earlier post, Indigenous lands are now about 20% of Australia. Indigenous Australians cannot build their own house on those lands. This problem cannot be fixed by ‘caring’, or by “Supporting the Indigenous economy” or by “Donating to worthy causes”. It must be fixed by a change in government policy. Its not enough that people CARE. To fix problems, you actually have to get stuff RIGHT.

    The Northern Territory Department of Education runs 40+ pretend schools for Aboriginals. They do not have full time teachers at those schools – they get a teacher only 1-4 days per week. Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeland_Learning_Centre. These cannot be changed to real schools by ‘caring’ or by “Supporting the Indigenous economy” or by “Donating to worthy causes”. They must be fixed by a change in government policy. Its not enough that people CARE. To fix problems, you actually have to get stuff RIGHT.

    Australian people and their governments do ‘feel good stuff’ rather than make necessary Indigenous policy changes. Happy Australia Day’ has one thing correct: ‘Its been 223 years already. If not now, when?’

  • Luke sloane

    This is an absolutely beautiful collection of digital characters on a page. It should be broadcast far and wide. Oh and I remember the dominoes thing, and yes it was terrible. One of my jobs is with chronic and complex health care. The inequaties are offensive between white and aboriginal people’s health care outcomes.

    Great work. As always.

  • Luke sloane

    Oh and mark talking directly to aboriginal people. From many many cultural sensitivity sessions I have been to through my work, all should know they really dislike being called indigenous.
    Again well done Matt. And mark, look forward to reading some comprehensive and supportive material on your blog……… raising awareness of the plight of Aboriginals in Australia

    I heart slacktivists. (that’s people that advocate for slacks right?)

  • http://www.mattgranfield.com/ Matt Granfield

    Thanks Luke :)

    And Mark, after you called me out I double-checked my research and you are just plain wrong about a few of those points you’re making.

    Up until 1967 Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander people were not counted as members of the population. Yes, they were technically citizens, but the constitution said that “In reckoning the numbers of the people of the Commonwealth, or of a State or other part of the Commonwealth, Aboriginal natives shall not be counted.” The referendum removed that. More to the point, 1967 was a symbolic watershed for indigenous reform, it was the resulting changes that started passive welfare problems. If you disagree, take it up with Noel Pearson, it’s him I’m quoting.

    Your claims about Aboriginal people being unable to build houses on traditional lands are just plain wrong. I would refer you to the Home Ownership on Indigenous Land Program (http://www.iba.gov.au/home-ownership/home-ownership-on-indigenous-land/)

    And yes, it’s important to not just care but do do things right, but this article isn’t about Government policy, it’s about what your average non-indigenous Australian can do right now to start solving problems. The first step of doing things right is understanding what is wrong. Dude, seriously, I’m on your side.

  • http://Website Mark

    I see I shall have to gird my loins, dip my goose feather quill in the inkpot, and construct another contribution to this hugely amusing discussion.

    >I double-checked my research and you are just plain wrong about a few of those points you’re making.
    I make lots of mistakes. All the time. However……

    You stated (incorrectly) ‘the 1967 referendum gave Aboriginal Australians the right to be counted as citizens in the census’.

    I stated (correctly) ‘ALL Indigenous Australians were citizens BEFORE 1967′ and ‘Aboriginal Australians were counted in EVERY Australian census, including the ones before the 1967 referendum.’

    I know what section 127 of the constitution said before the 1967 referendum. It doesn’t make your statements correct, or mine incorrect. Since Indigenous Australians were actually counted (read the old census forms, if you like), and the referendum didn’t affect their citizenship, right to vote or equal pay, the actual effect (yes, dear reader, there was one) of s.127 of the constitution was……? Those that get it right won’t have to stay back after school :)

    > Your claims about Aboriginal people being unable to build houses on traditional lands are just plain wrong. I would refer you to the Home Ownership on Indigenous Land Program (http://www.iba.gov.au/home-ownership/home-ownership-on-indigenous-land/)

    The HOIL (Home Ownership on Indigenous Land) program was created (with a four year budget allocation of more than $100 million) back when Mal Brough was Indigenous Affairs minister and John Howard was PM. But three years later it had not made one loan (because for Indigenous Australians to own a home on their own land, some laws and some government policies have to be changed.) In May 2010 Mal Brough’s successor, Jenny Macklin, announced that $56 million of the HOIL money would be moved temporarily into the Home Ownership Program (a program which gives loans to Indigenous Australians in Sydney, Melbourne, regional towns etc (where they ARE allowed to buy or build their own home, and where they can get a loan from NAB or ANZ or AUSSIE anyway – unlike on Indigenous Lands).

    There are 4 communities on Indigenous Lands (and we haven’t forgotten that we’re talkin’ about 20% of Australia – equivalent to the 29th largest country in the world, have we?) are technically eligible for a HOIL loan at the moment, all in the Northern Territory. 16 HOIL loans have been issued in one of those communities. Dunno if anyone’s gonna try and get a loan in the other three communities ’cause it appears that after 38 years, title to the land / ownership of the house may automatically revert to the Commonwealth Government. Cute idea eh? – get a mortgage, build a house, pay off the mortgage, lose the house to the government.

    Like the Indigenous guy on Palm Island said “the difference between a black man and a white man is this, when a white man dies his family gets his house. When a black man dies the government gets it.”

    So, who’s correct on this one – me or you? On 99.999% of Indigenous lands, the traditional owners can’t build their own house. On 0.001% of Indigenous lands they can – if they’re willing to accept that they may not be able to keep it. Well, I’m feeling generous – shall we call it a draw?

    Re Luke’s comment:
    >From many many cultural sensitivity sessions I have been to through my work, all should know they really dislike being called indigenous.

    Some dislike being called Indigenous, not all. Its a bit like the term Eskimo (used in Alaska, but now discouraged in Canada and Greenland). There are lots of options: Aborigines. Torres Strait Islanders. Indigenous. Koori. Now we have “The National Congress of Australia’s First Peoples” (http://nationalcongress.com.au/ ). Five years from now, another term may be in vogue. For convenience, I use what the Government uses. When they change to “Minister for Australia’s First Peoples’ Affairs” then I’ll use that.

    From Matt: > More to the point, 1967 was a symbolic watershed for indigenous reform
    More to the point, ‘symbology’ is EXACTLY the problem. Symbology (eg Aboriginal vs Indigenous vs First Peoples) is NOT a substitute for changing laws and government policies. Symbology will not convert pretend schools (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeland_Learning_Centre ) into real ones. Symbology will not give Indigenous Australians secure title to a house on their own land.

    >this article isn’t about Government policy, it’s about what your average non-indigenous Australian can do right now to start solving problems

    Gees, I might as well be talking to the wall! Average non-indigenous Australians, if they want to start solving problems, have to make the government change laws and policy. Symbology, cultural awareness, engagement, consultation, caring, sympathising just doesn’t do it.

    Its not enough that people CARE. To fix problems we gotta do stuff RIGHT.

    Mark

    PS – for everyone’s enjoyment on the ‘if not now, when’ issue – here’s a quote from the Australian Education Union LAST YEAR, authorised by their Federal President, Angelo Gavrielatos:

    “The realistic timeframe that should be considered to achieve outcomes for Indigenous people equal to the rest of the community is to focus on the outcomes that should be expected for the children to be born in 20 to 25 years from today.”

  • http://Website kat

    Thanks for the article Matt. I like how you tell your story and make a point, along a thread that teased me along to read a little more… & then a bit more… & then the rest. (I do have to say, I scrolled right down to the bottom to find the ‘**’ footnote. : )

    I’d like to say “I hope to make a difference one day”, but buggered if I know if I will. I’m working towards it, learning policy & politics on the ground, studying development aid & how to build effective policy & engage in proper consultation & that kind of stuff… but in the end, goodness… I really don’t know.

    It’ll take a paradigm shift for the nation to achieve what needs to be done. I sure hope that that shift happens really soon. I think that having people caring AND putting information out there (& not just un-constructively criticising (!!!)) is a great way to nudge it all a little bit further into reality. So again, thanks.

  • http://Website Mark

    $100,000 per year per person – that is what Australian governments spend on remote Indigenous Australians. That’s $400,000 per year of government expenditure on a family of four. Every year. Over ten years, $1 million of taxpayer money will be spent by the government for each very remote Indigenous Australian. Of course, those Indigenous Australians will only receive part of that money directly; most goes in services, bureaucrats, consultants, etc.

    The data on government Indigenous expenditure is brought to us courtesy of:
    a) The Productivity Commission’s report on government Indigenous expenditure, which is $21 billion per year.
    b) The Australian Bureau of Statistics which has the data on Indigenous Australians, where they live, who uses govt services, who lives in public housing, etc.

    Now, some taxpayers may think that spending $100,000 per remote Indigenous Australian every year ($400,000 on each family of 4) is a huge amount of taxpayer money. Fortunately, however, Australia is a rich country. VERY rich. If that’s what we gotta spend to fix the problem, well, actually, we CAN afford it.

    The problem of course, is that we’re spending the money but the problems are NOT getting fixed.

    Its not enough that people are willing to THROW MONEY at the problem. Its not enough that people CARE. Spending money and caring may assuage non-Indigenous guilt. They are not a substitute for getting policies and laws right.

  • http://Website cialis france

    la phrase Remarquable

Follow Me

Blog Categories

Twitterings